Back to homepage

Coast Guard, ORNL test butanol in small marine engines

By Kris Bevill | February 21, 2012

The U.S. Coast Guard is working on a three-year project with researchers at the U.S. DOE’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory to test the potential for butanol to be used in the Coast Guard’s smaller marine craft. The research project will test the effects of a gasoline/butanol blend containing 16.1 percent biobutanol on 225HP and 300HP outboard engines. Operational testing will conclude in mid-2014, with results expected to be released shortly thereafter, according to Rich Hansen, branch chief - surface branch at the USCG’s Research and Development Center. Findings from the USCG/ORNL testing may also be applied to civilian watercraft, he said.

The USCG currently uses commercially available gasoline, which often contains 10 percent ethanol, in its small marine craft. Hansen said biobutanol was selected for marine engine testing because it offers favorable properties and has the potential to become available in the marketplace in coming years. Biobutanol also offers the opportunity for the USCG to lower its carbon footprint, which is a priority of the U.S. military. “The USCG would like to position itself to be ready for alternative fuels that may become commercially available and help meet carbon footprint reduction goals and comply with the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007,” Hansen said.

EISA requires any alternative or synthetic transportation fuel purchased by federal agencies to emit the same or fewer life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions than its petroleum counterpart. Corn-based ethanol, cellulosic ethanol, biodiesel and biobutanol derived from corn starch all meet the emissions threshold reduction requirements. However, while ethanol is not currently recommended to be used at percentages greater than 10 percent in marine engines, testing conducted last year by the National Marine Manufacturers Association and the American Boat and Yacht Council showed promising results for butanol. Butanol is not yet widely available in the fuels market, but butanol technology developers have begun acquiring corn ethanol facilities with the intent to convert them for biobutanol production. The first of these facilities, a former corn ethanol plant in Luverne, Minn., was purchased by Gevo Inc. and is expected to begin producing biobutanol later this year. Gevo plans to sell some of its product for marine applications as an alternative to ethanol-blended fuels.

 

3 Responses

  1. Mike Quinn

    2012-02-22

    1

    "When it come to biofuels, you don't ask how much fossil fuels you use to produce biofuels. That's irrelevant. Ask yourself this question: "How many gallons of water per miles driven on biofuels", and that's about a hundred to a thousand times more than on fossil fuels. So when you subscribe to biofuels, you have a license on environmental destruction and on water consumption." Quote from Dr. Tad Patzek, Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas, Board Vice-President and chair of the University of Texas Department of Petroleum Engineering, February 14, 2012, starting at 39:48: http://youtu.be/dO9GxdMEGME

  2. lacertus

    2012-03-06

    2

    Water is like energy, neither created nor destroyed. Using waste material as stock for butanol or cellulosic ethanol is not destructive, nor does it remove productive farmland from food production.

  3. mtman

    2012-03-10

    3

    Mike, you are all wet. Tad Patzek's opinion is tainted since he is pro-oil. Why don't you ask him about the tar sands project in Alberta. How much water is used to get that sticky muck out of the ground before it can even go to a refinery which will require even more water? It is a well known fact that biofuels uses considerably less water than the oil industry does.

  4.  

    Leave a Reply

    Comments are closed